Value of Library and Information Services
Value of Library and Information Services
Project Update: February 2002
Overview
The research questions guiding this study are:
- What is the value of using library and information services to the
hospital or academic health sciences center?
- What kinds of information do institutional administrators recognize
as valid measures of the contributions which librarians through the
provision of services make to the bottom line of the organization?
Following the balanced scorecard framework, this study approaches value
as contributions to organizational success. To support the measurement
and communication of the value of library and information services (LIS),
this study has developed a taxonomy of LIS contributions to organizational
success in hospitals and academic health sciences centers.
Data Collection
Following a review of the literature conducted in the fall of 2000, the
data collection in this study began with a series of interviews with LIS
directors and institutional administrators in hospitals and academic health
sciences centers. In the spring of 2001 a total of twelve interviews were
conducted with LIS directors and institutional administrators in the mid-Atlantic
region. The second phase of data collection entailed a focus group of
hospital administrators. This focus group was held in June of 2001, with
five administrators participating. Findings from the interviews and focus
group supported the development of the taxonomy of LIS contributions.
The final phase of data collection is currently underway and entails
the administration of parallel Web-based questionnaires to LIS directors
and institutional administrators at 120 hospitals and academic health
sciences centers. In the fall of 2001 two versions of the questionnaires
were pilot-tested.
Data from Likert-scale items in the questionnaires will support a comparison
of LIS directors' and institutional administrators' perceptions of the
value of LIS expressed as contributions to critical success factors for
hospitals and academic health sciences centers. Responses to open-ended
items in the questionnaires will address methods of measuring and communicating
LIS contributions. Analysis of the quantitative data from the questionnaire
will rely on descriptive statistical procedures. No a priori hypotheses
will be tested.
Reporting
A paper introducing the study and reporting the development of the taxonomy
was favorably reviewed and will appear in the July issue of the JMLA.
Two presentations on this study will be made at the MLA annual meeting
in Dallas. Keith Cogdill will give a report of the study as a whole. In
addition Stephanie Harris, the research assistant for the study, will
present a paper on the development of the user survey template in the
student paper session (the Medical Library Education's "Debuting
Fresh Perspectives" session).
Keith Cogdill, Ph.D.
University of Maryland, CLIS
kcogdill@wam.umd.edu
|